.
Feedback

Eagle Rock Neighborhood Council Supports Amendment to Keep Northern Highland Park in CD14

The Neighborhood Council backs Huizar’s plan to keep Eagle Rock and Highland Park together.

The on Tuesday declined to consider a resolution that would lend their support to public calls to delay L.A.’s Redistricting proceedings and make the process more responsive to public wishes.

The ERNC agreed instead—by a 9-1 vote and three abstentions—to table the request until it has more information to act on. Mike Hernandez, assistant chief of staff to City Council members Jan Perry and Bernard Parks, made the request before the ERNC board.

Keeping Eagle Rock and Highland Park Together

In another 12-1 vote on a related issue, however, the ERNC board agreed to support a Redistricting proposal known as “Amendment G,” which seeks to keep intact the northern portion of Highland Park that shares Council District 14 with Eagle Rock. Amendment G would also Glassell Park intact in CD 1 instead of splitting it up between two Council districts.

The backing of Amendment G was in response to a presentation by Ana E. Cubas, chief of staff to , who told the ERNC board that Huizar supports retaining Highland Park’s thriving business district north of York Boulevard, while keeping Glassell Park whole. Last week, Cubas informed Patch that Huizar is committed to including northern Highland Park in final Redistricting maps—click here to read that story.

Some Highland Park business owners have also expressed their desire to remain in CD14, including Cathi Milligan of the on York Boulevard.

"As a business owner and resident of north Highland Park, I feel a strong tie to the Eagle Rock community," said Milligan at a Downtown redistricting meeting in February.  "I'm hoping all of you will take this relationship into consideration. We have a lot of projects in CD14 that will disappear if we become a part of CD1, and I'd hate to see that happen. The economic development in this region is of the utmost importance."

Perry’s Offensive

The ERNC’s decisions on Tuesday night came a day after CD 9 Council member and mayoral candidate Perry accused City Council President Herb Wesson and Huizar of trying to manipulate the Redistricting process by depriving her of large parts of Downtown that currently lie in her district. (The latest Redistricting maps, which are scheduled to be finalized by the City Council Rules Committee on March 16 before going before the full Council, allocate a sizeable chunk of Downtown to Huizar’s CD 14 in lieu of northern Highland Park and almost all of Mount Washington.)

Asked for Huizar’s reaction to Perry’s accusations, the Council member’s communications director, Rick Coca retorted: "Such cheap-shot and desperate tactics do not deserve a response."

Perry’s Assistant Chief of Staff Hernandez told the ERNC board that the Councilman’s concerns were summed up in a motion that was seconded by Parks and introduced in the City Council on February 24.

Not only are the redistricting maps illegal, they run roughshod over long-established community partnerships and links as well as people’s wishes, argued the motion, which Council President Wesson has set aside until the map are finalized, Hernandez said.

Asked by ERNC board member Osbaldo Luna why Hernandez was approaching neighborhood councils at this late stage in the Redistricting process, the assistant chief of staff replied that Perry’s office did not expect the Redistricting Commission to act as unilaterally as it has in the face of considerable public opposition to the new maps of Los Angeles.

Hernandez told Patch separately that Perry and Parks notified City Attorney Carmen Trutanich on Monday that they would be taking legal action against the Redistricting process in the L.A. Superior Court as well as the federal court.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Highland Park-Mount Washington Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Erik May 24, 2013 at 07:31 pm
Just noticed myself the other day. This is across all Patch sites. Very disappointed in thisRead More oversight.
nonoise May 20, 2013 at 08:01 am
I want peace and quiet in my home. "No way, Jose" believes I should not have peace andRead More quiet in my home. That is a dicatator.
nonoise May 19, 2013 at 11:17 am
False? Wrong!! I have the letter as proof. Did "no way, Jose" write the letter? IfRead More patch wants to see it, let me know. It is the truth.
Elijah H May 21, 2013 at 05:04 pm
Poor Gil must be thinking right now, "with friends like these..."
nonoise May 20, 2013 at 06:11 pm
Church members want peace and quiet in their own homes but the freedom to force religion on others.Read More And, they want the freedom to force noise into other people's homes. Anyone from Divine Saviour want some noise forced into their home like some banging metal pans?
nonoise May 20, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Jesse is fine. He is campaining for Cedilllo. Neither have ran away. Both have appreciated myRead More help in campaining for Cedillo. His eyeliner must have faded away. All that matters is that he will do more than "no way, Jose" has done in 12 years with "do nothing, Ed Reyes." My problem is not with bells, it is with the noise (amplified sound) from Divine Saviour Catholic Church. You need to get your facts straight. Noise is a mental issue. Divine Saviour Catholic Church is the one with a mental issue. They are hypocrites that they want to force noise on others then they themselves want peace and quiet. Get the facts.