.
Feedback

No Charges Filed Against Cactus Gallery for Potluck Party

Sandra Mastroianni thanks supporters of her gallery for writing to the courts in her defense.

Sandra Mastroianni, owner of Eagle Rock's Cactus Gallery, announced on Facebook Thursday morning that no charges would be filed against her for a Dec. 8 incident in which officers from the Los Angeles Police Department broke up a celebratory potluck at the studio featuring live music and wine.

Mastroianni posted the following message on Facebook at 9:30 a.m.

Good morning FB family and friends - I just got back from my court appearance regarding the misdemeanors I was charged with on Dec 8th. NO CHARGES were filed! I feel so relieved. Thanks to all of you who expressed your concern, wrote letters, made phone calls and emailed the city and PD. Feelin' the love today!!!

According to Mastroianni, up to 10 LAPD Northeast Division Officers flooded Cactus Gallery on the evening of Saturday, Dec. 8 to break up a potluck party celebrating the gallery's final public showing.

Mastroianni said that live music was played during the party, and that alcohol was served, but not sold. There was also a tip jar for patrons.

She said that the party, which officers cited at 8:15 p.m., was not loud or rowdy, and that the live music comprised three woman and one man had barely played three songs when the event was stopped.

LAPD Northeast Captain Bill Murphy said officers were drawn to the Gallery by the live music, which he said they described as "loud for the area."

Once inside, Murphy said, officers were required to cite Mastroianni for serving alcohol without a permit.

Following the citation, Mastroianni took to Facebook to called on supporters to write letters to the court explaining that she had never sold alcohol at Cactus.

However, Murphy said even if Mastroianni hadn't sold liquor, it was still against the law to serve without a permit.

“The point that needs to be known is that an art gallery or any other business—a laundromat, tire shop, whatever—can’t just bring in wine and cheese and serve it,” Murphy told Patch in December. “You have to get a permit for that—and that didn’t happen.”

The Alcohol Beverage Commission's trade manual states: "Giving, selling, or furnishing free alcoholic beverages at an unlicensed salon, clothing store, jewelry store, art gallery, etc. is not legal (California Business & Professions Code Section 23300). Businesses like these will be considered illegal bottle clubs if alcohol is provided to, or consumed by, customers (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code Sec. 25604)"

In Decmember, Murphy told Patch that, had somebody gotten into a car accident after drinking alcohol at Cactus, the Police Department could have been sued for failing to enforce the law.

Mastroianni told Patch on Thursday that she wasn't sure the charges weren't filed, but she was grateful. 

"Not sure what happened, maybe the art gods were aware of the citation and did their magic, maybe pressure from people in the neighborhood made the police department rethink it, maybe it got lost, maybe it was a mistake, not sure," she said. "I am glad it is over. I sell art, not wine."

Murphy said he was fine with the fact that the City Attorney had decided not to file charges.

"We had a good hour-long meeting with members of the arts community and I explained all kind of rules," he said. "I'm not upset at all; it gave us opportunity to educate the public. They're not a menace to society or anything."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Highland Park-Mount Washington Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Erik May 24, 2013 at 07:31 pm
Just noticed myself the other day. This is across all Patch sites. Very disappointed in thisRead More oversight.
nonoise May 20, 2013 at 08:01 am
I want peace and quiet in my home. "No way, Jose" believes I should not have peace andRead More quiet in my home. That is a dicatator.
nonoise May 19, 2013 at 11:17 am
False? Wrong!! I have the letter as proof. Did "no way, Jose" write the letter? IfRead More patch wants to see it, let me know. It is the truth.
Elijah H May 21, 2013 at 05:04 pm
Poor Gil must be thinking right now, "with friends like these..."
nonoise May 20, 2013 at 06:11 pm
Church members want peace and quiet in their own homes but the freedom to force religion on others.Read More And, they want the freedom to force noise into other people's homes. Anyone from Divine Saviour want some noise forced into their home like some banging metal pans?
nonoise May 20, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Jesse is fine. He is campaining for Cedilllo. Neither have ran away. Both have appreciated myRead More help in campaining for Cedillo. His eyeliner must have faded away. All that matters is that he will do more than "no way, Jose" has done in 12 years with "do nothing, Ed Reyes." My problem is not with bells, it is with the noise (amplified sound) from Divine Saviour Catholic Church. You need to get your facts straight. Noise is a mental issue. Divine Saviour Catholic Church is the one with a mental issue. They are hypocrites that they want to force noise on others then they themselves want peace and quiet. Get the facts.