.
Feedback

Release of New Mural Ordinance Delayed

Those eager to see the latest draft of an ordinance that would allow more murals in Los Angeles will have to wait.

Angelenos who were hoping to this month see the final draft of an ordinance that would once again allow murals on private property will need to keep waiting, said Tanner Blackman of the Los Angeles City Planning Department.

Blackman has been serving a liaison between community members and city hall as Los Angeles has attempted to draft an ordinance that would legalize new murals and decriminalize existing ones.

The city has prohibited the painting of murals on private property since 2002.

After holding several community input meetings throughout the city----the city released the first draft of the ordinance at a ceremony in Boyle Heights.

A 60-day comment period, which closed in February, followed the release of the draft. Blackman said the city is currently in the process of editing the ordinance based on feedback received during the public comment period.

"There will be a number of substantive changes to the December draft, and it can take a while to get everyone to agree," Blackman wrote in an e-mail. "In February 2012, I had anticipated that we would be able to present a draft ordinance and staff report to the City Planning Commission (CPC) in April.  This did not happen.  More recently, the Mural Ordinance was scheduled for the May 10 CPC hearing.  Unfortunately, that date will be postponed, too."

Blackman said he was not happy about the delay, but hoped that a revised draft would be ready for public viewing "very soon."

During the community meeting held in Eagle Rock in November, some members of the Los Angeles muralist community said provisions in the first draft of the ordinance created many "gray areas" that would need to be addressed.

Dave Russell, an artist from the Mobil Mural Lab, told Blackman that the broad guidelines would need to fully vetted by the mural community before they were set in stone.

“I think each bullet point presents a lot of gray area which really needs to be discussed and have the input of the mural community,” he said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Highland Park-Mount Washington Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
nonoise May 20, 2013 at 08:01 am
I want peace and quiet in my home. "No way, Jose" believes I should not have peace andRead More quiet in my home. That is a dicatator.
nonoise May 19, 2013 at 11:17 am
False? Wrong!! I have the letter as proof. Did "no way, Jose" write the letter? IfRead More patch wants to see it, let me know. It is the truth.
Elijah H May 21, 2013 at 05:04 pm
Poor Gil must be thinking right now, "with friends like these..."
nonoise May 20, 2013 at 06:11 pm
Church members want peace and quiet in their own homes but the freedom to force religion on others.Read More And, they want the freedom to force noise into other people's homes. Anyone from Divine Saviour want some noise forced into their home like some banging metal pans?
nonoise May 20, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Jesse is fine. He is campaining for Cedilllo. Neither have ran away. Both have appreciated myRead More help in campaining for Cedillo. His eyeliner must have faded away. All that matters is that he will do more than "no way, Jose" has done in 12 years with "do nothing, Ed Reyes." My problem is not with bells, it is with the noise (amplified sound) from Divine Saviour Catholic Church. You need to get your facts straight. Noise is a mental issue. Divine Saviour Catholic Church is the one with a mental issue. They are hypocrites that they want to force noise on others then they themselves want peace and quiet. Get the facts.