.
Feedback

Pasadena City Council to Discuss SR-710 Tonight

Opponents of the SR-710 extension plan to attend the meeting in large numbers to voice their opposition.

Opponents of the State Route-710 extension are hoping to gain a powerful ally on Monday evening, as the Pasadena City Council will consider a recommendation to oppose three proposed extension projects that would be built through or below the neighborhoods of Garvanza and San Rafael.

The recommendation up for consideration by the City Council reads as follows:

(1)         Take an action to formally oppose the following SR-710 Study alternatives currently being considered by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority:
          Alternative H-2:  An arterial road along the current Avenue 64
          Alternative H-6: A highway along Huntington Drive
          Fair Oaks/Pasadena Avenue connecting the I-10 to I-210  
          Alternative F-5:  A freeway tunnel connecting I-10 to SR-134
(2)         Authorize the Mayor to send a letter to the Metro Board of Directors advising of the City’s position; and
(3)         Direct staff to continue to evaluate all other SR-710 Study alternatives and return to City Council with further recommendations as information becomes available. 


Click and

According to the No 710 on Avenue 64 Facebook group, Garvanza residents are planning to attend the meeting in large numbers to state their opposition.

"It is important to show up in great numbers to make the greatest impact. Of all the meetings this is the first to have a real Metro representative on hand, and they need to see the faces of opposition," posted Charles Miller on the No 710 on Avenue 64 Facebook page.

The Pasadena City Council will meet on Monday, August 13 at 6:30 p.m. in the Conference Plaza Building, Room 101-105, of the Pasadena Convention Center located at 300 East Green St.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Highland Park-Mount Washington Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
nonoise May 20, 2013 at 08:01 am
I want peace and quiet in my home. "No way, Jose" believes I should not have peace andRead More quiet in my home. That is a dicatator.
nonoise May 19, 2013 at 11:17 am
False? Wrong!! I have the letter as proof. Did "no way, Jose" write the letter? IfRead More patch wants to see it, let me know. It is the truth.
Elijah H May 21, 2013 at 05:04 pm
Poor Gil must be thinking right now, "with friends like these..."
nonoise May 20, 2013 at 06:11 pm
Church members want peace and quiet in their own homes but the freedom to force religion on others.Read More And, they want the freedom to force noise into other people's homes. Anyone from Divine Saviour want some noise forced into their home like some banging metal pans?
nonoise May 20, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Jesse is fine. He is campaining for Cedilllo. Neither have ran away. Both have appreciated myRead More help in campaining for Cedillo. His eyeliner must have faded away. All that matters is that he will do more than "no way, Jose" has done in 12 years with "do nothing, Ed Reyes." My problem is not with bells, it is with the noise (amplified sound) from Divine Saviour Catholic Church. You need to get your facts straight. Noise is a mental issue. Divine Saviour Catholic Church is the one with a mental issue. They are hypocrites that they want to force noise on others then they themselves want peace and quiet. Get the facts.