Update: CHP Releases Details of Fatal Freeway Crash
The car caught on fire immediately after it was rear-ended going southbound on the 110 Friday.
Update: The California Highway Patrol has released its official report of the fatal car crash that took the life of an infant passenger on Friday evening.
The report indicates that driver of the vehicle had pulled over in lane three of the Arroyo Seco Parkway due to a flat front passenger tire.
"[The driver of the second vehicle] collided with the rear of the first vehicle. This caused [the first vehicle] to catch on fire and eventually become fully engulfed. The 1 year old passenger of [the first vehicle] became trapped in her car seat as a result of the collision. Attempts were made by the involved parties and witnesses to remove the child from the vehicle but they were overcome by the fire and unsuccessful in their attempts. The child sustained fatal injuries."
According to CHP's incident report, drugs or alcohol were "not a factor" in the incident. No arrests were made.
Update: According to City News Service, several residents who lived near the 110 freeway attempted to rescue the toddler who died in a fiery car crash on Friday evening.
One of the neighbors who attempted to save the child, identified as 11-month-old Leiana Ramirez, was Jair Aguirre.
A 26-year-old community college student who lives in the neighborhood, Aguirre told the Los Angeles Times that he and three other neighborhood residents attempted to fight the fire with a water hose and buckets.
Aguirre also told The Times that he tried to remove the infant from the car after smashing the window with a baseball bat, but was burned and driven back by the growing flames inside the car.
Update: Leiana Ramirez has been identified as the toddler killed in the crash. She was "here barely 11 months," according to an official at the Los Angeles County Coroner's Office Saturday morning.
Previously: A girl almost 2-years-old was killed after a motorist's car was rear-ended on the 110 and caught fire around 5:30 p.m. Friday.
"The car caught fire immediately and the mother or other motorists could not get close enough to rescue the child," said South Pas Police Chief Joseph Payne. "The mother was burned on the hands and arms. The car was fully engulfed when we arrived on scene."
The accident occurred while motorists were driving southbound near the York Boulevard exit in Highland Park.
Matthew Spence, a spokesman for the Los Angeles Fire Department, said that "multiple patients were still being assessed" to determine the severity of their injuries.
California Highway Patrol reported police still on the scene at around 7:30 p.m. Friday. And a SigAlert was issued for three southbound lanes, reported the Pasadena Star-News.
A stretch of the winding freeway was closed across three lanes in the
Southbound direction while the crash was under investigation,
according to the California Highway Patrol.
To read our original story, click here.
Check back with Patch as we continue to follow the story.
JW
9:38 am on Saturday, August 27, 2011
A tragic accident for all concerned. Very sad. However, . . .
I missed the relevant information about where the almost "2-years-old" two year old was for barely 11 months. Do you read this over before publishing?
Susan R
9:50 am on Saturday, August 27, 2011
The poor child was trapped in one of those car seats that you can not easily get out of. She may have lived if it were not for being trapped in the car seat.
Something to think about.
monique
11:39 am on Saturday, August 27, 2011
This story failed to state that people in their cars that were just sitting their looking on failed to help the mother was crying out that her daughter was in the car and only a few people helped while others just sat and did nothing its sad and disgusting and horrible that now a days people can hear someone cying for help and the screams of a child dying and no one helps. I read the whole story in the mobile L.A times on Facebook.
Alberto
11:24 am on Monday, August 29, 2011
More people is not always better than good people. Not all people are able to muster the courage to deal with a burning car and, in that case, it isn't helpful to have them adding to chaos and confusion. Sometimes it's enough that people bear witness and share the pain. Don't be so quick to judge lest ye yourself be judged, yeah?
David Fonseca
1:39 pm on Saturday, August 27, 2011
Hey JW, the initial reports was that the child was two-years-old. As you can see from the *update* reports at the scene confirmed that the child was only 11 months old.
Monique, we'll have an update soon. From reports from the scene, there were numerous residents of the area who tried to help by pouring water on the car and smashing the car window with a bat.
Susan R
4:08 pm on Saturday, August 27, 2011
This is a good case for no seats and/or baby/child car seats. You can die from being trapped in one.
Ken Camp
8:32 am on Sunday, August 28, 2011
Somehow I just knew that Susan Rocha would exploit this gory tragedy for her own purposes, namely to scream at her imagined "nanny state" and the many regulatory agencies and laws that are here for our protection. I think she is using this tragedy so she can promote her beloved tea bagger movement, that's all, and, of course, she has absolutely no shame.
Ron Rosen
9:02 am on Sunday, August 28, 2011
But mostly you can die if you're not using one.
Chris Colburn
8:05 am on Wednesday, August 31, 2011
I beg to differ Susan, and think you have your wires crossed. I have been in the emergency medical field as an EMT/Firefighter and an ER nurse for almost 20 combined years. In that time, I've responded to hundreds of accidents and seen scores more victims of crashes in the ER. The factor in ALL of their survival from their injuries were properly worn safety restraints and child safety seats. Of all of the fatal accidents where my team had to extricate the victim (cut them out of the car with heavy machinery) or they were ejected from the vehicle, well above 90% were unrestrained. I have seen seatbelts and child seats save lives first-hand. So to prove your "theory" wrong, here is just a few excerpts from "peer reviewed" (that means the results are concurred with by evaluating the data presented; usually by others in the same research field) academic studies of credible origin. So, believe what you will and don't wear your seatbelt. I'll be more than happy to say "I told you so" when I see you in my ER.
http://www.jmu.edu/safetyplan/vehicle/generaldriver/safetybelt.shtml
http://www.nsc.org/safety_road/DriverSafety/Pages/SeatBelts.aspx
Susan R
4:21 pm on Saturday, August 27, 2011
http://www.fiberpipe.net/~tiktin/
Ron Rosen
6:36 pm on Saturday, August 27, 2011
This was a horrible thing, but it should teach us that you should never stop on a freeway, especially the 110. Better to drive off the freeway, shred your tire and destroy your wheel, than to be hit like this. Although all the stories keep mentioning people who watched but didn't help, it sounds like a lot of people did help, and it doesn't appear that the result would have been different if those people had helped.
Alberto
11:28 am on Monday, August 29, 2011
Absolutely: get off the freeway, whatever it takes. It dangerous enough to go at very low speeds on our stretch of the 110 but stopping is just a bad idea no matter the circumstances.
All what-ifs aside though, it's just another one of those random things that happens in life that hurts the people involved and pains us all. Love and strength to the family of the infant.
Natalie
9:53 pm on Saturday, August 27, 2011
This makes me realize how important a car fire extinguisher is. A motorist with an extinguisher could have run over to help.
Alberto
11:30 am on Monday, August 29, 2011
It's got me thinking about my reasoning for not having an extinguisher in the car: it was add to junk in the car. ...still, I've got a ton of hiking things in there so maybe my priorities are just all messed up. Think I'm going to reconsider earlier thinking now.
Drew Ready
6:21 am on Sunday, August 28, 2011
Hi all,
One thing I've noticed is that ever since they put the concrete walls up on both sides of the 110, average speeds have increased. I suspect its due to the psychological effect the concrete walls have on the driver, making the freeway feel more like a speedway - also giving the driver a false sense of security. They may have been constructed to keep crashing cars from going into the arroyo or crossing the center divide, but due to increase speeds, I suspect we'll see more accidents as a result.
Such a sad event, prayers and well wishes go out to the child's family.
Tony Cardona
6:18 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011
I've seen lots of accidents on the 110 fwy, and for a long time there were cars that went off the 110 N fwy into the arroyo below. The problem is when accidents happen cars stop and this makes it extremely difficult for emergency vehicles to get through. To add to this problem when the fire dept permanently closed fire resources it also adds to response time because now instead of having a resource responding from lincoln heights the next closest might be all the way from boyle heights.
People need to step up and assist others in need. Did we not learn from the planes that were hijacked from 911 where passengers did not act?
bobo
9:12 am on Monday, August 29, 2011
Good advice to pull off the freeway if possible. There are too many blind spots with all the curves of the freeway, and even more so with the new walls. But this looked to be on a straight stretch so not sure why driver rear ended other car. How fast could the car catch on fire? If other people are attempting to help, seems like there was time to get child out.
Frank Mackey
10:28 am on Monday, August 29, 2011
How fast? They are filled with gasoline what do you think?
Alberto
11:47 am on Monday, August 29, 2011
We, all of us, drive too fast in general and on our stretch of the 110 especially. It's easy to imagine how the rear-ending could happen on the narrow freeway with general inattention + excessive speed most of us exhibit these days. There's also just dumb, tragic luck sometimes.
Having two stories of cars immediately catching fire does concern me though; were both cars Pintos? Again, just dumb, tragic luck sometimes is a possible reason but, though there's a lot of fuel in the car, it should just spill out across the freeway. What ignited those fires?
"Seems like there was time to get the child out": no bobo, it does not seem like that at all. I think you missed the detail in the story that states the child was not saved - had the child been saved then your comment would be right on the money.
I could say that it seems to me that you had time to think better about your last sentence before you clicked "Submit" but evidently that wasn't the case and my comment wouldn't change a thing.
bobo
9:14 am on Monday, August 29, 2011
Just saying, I would risk being burnt to save my child
Alberto
11:58 am on Monday, August 29, 2011
No bobo, I think you're just saying, "I didn't really take time to reflect on relevant details in the article. Details like:
1. 'Attempts were made by the involved parties and witnesses to remove the child from the vehicle but they were overcome by the fire and unsuccessful in their attempts...'
2. 'Aguirre also told The Times that he tried to remove the infant from the car...but was burned and driven back by the growing flames...'
3. 'The mother was burned on the hands and arms.' "
Not only did these people - including the mother - "risk being burnt", they were actually burnt in an effort to free the baby.
Where you and others in this thread would like to comment, with a judgmental tone, that by-standers, parents, and/or safety devices can be blamed for the tragedy, I'd offer that none of you are so brave or would be any better composed if actually faced with the horrible circumstance the mother and those witnesses faced.
Don't "just say" - be better than that. Do better than that.
Again, sympathies to the family of young Leiana.
David Fonseca
10:16 am on Monday, August 29, 2011
Bobo: What sources have indicated that the mother did not make an attempt to save her child's life?
David Fonseca
12:04 pm on Monday, August 29, 2011
Hey all: I think that we should all try to use this thread to express our grief over this tragic accident and share our sympathy and love for those involved. There will definitely come a time to talk about what could have been done to prevent this. There will definitely be future articles where we can discuss what could have been done to prevent this accident.
antoinette patterson
3:01 pm on Monday, August 29, 2011
i knew leiana and her parents personally. i met leiana when she was 4 months old. she was visiting the daycare that i work in. fell in love with her the moment i saw her. she was beautiful with dark curly hair. i was her grew up into a smart spunky lillte girl. we had just had a cupcake birthday party for her at the school. it was sad to hear her dad told me she was gone. today august 29th would have been leiana's 2nd birthday. happy birthday baby girl, i will miss u always. love teacher toni.
sandra
7:19 pm on Monday, August 29, 2011
Happy Birthday my Little Hello Kitty" you will be missed. love, Teacher Sandra
Mindy B
7:41 pm on Monday, August 29, 2011
so sorry for your loss Sandra and Antoinette - caring teachers and caregivers like you are an essential part of any healthy community. please know that our thoughts and well wishes are going out to all of you.
Mishaun
7:58 pm on Monday, August 29, 2011
This was one of my closest friends & her baby. People should really watch their inconsiderate comments. You never know who's watching & some of you idiots just don't Care! Family, my Prayers go out for You & your Broken Hearts. Love ya' MUCH Ramirez Family <3
Susan R
9:44 pm on Monday, August 29, 2011
I am very sorry for the loss to the family. My comments have nothing to do with the family or those that tired to help. They have to do with freedom of choice to wear seatbelts. This was a real tradgedy. My condolences to all family and friends. And, those that tried to save the child are real heros.
Ken Camp
3:51 pm on Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Not so fast, Susan . . . your comments were an attempt at grandstanding your tea bagger philosophy and had nothing to do with this poor child. In short, you were gloating. Having followed many of your posts previously, I can only assume that, once again, you were indulging in your usual bullying, bossy behavior. You remind me of that jerk who recently lost his life in a demonstration against motorcycle helmets. His motorcycle flipped over, he struck his unprotected head and died. Seems fitting, doesn't it?
ADD
11:36 am on Tuesday, August 30, 2011
I knew the Mother she is a friend and the report is wrong Leiana just turnd 2 years of age on the 29th of Aug. She was 45 days older then my child, the Mother and I were both caring at the same time. Simaka *Mother* is a really good person and lived for her first and only child. Leiana will be dearly missed.
David Fonseca
4:05 pm on Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Ken--I'm going to ask you to refrain from making personal attacks. We can comment on each others' ideas, not personalities.
dan watson
4:52 pm on Tuesday, August 30, 2011
I won't comment on Susan's personality, but will strongly disagree with her statement about this tragedy being a good case for not requiring safety belts or child car seats. I don't know what her expertise in this area is, but I've been a police officer for 38 years and have seen countless collisions where occupants lives were saved by safety belts and car seats. I've seen others where people who were not properly belted died when they would have survived otherwise. And, I've never come across an accident where someone survived because they were thrown from a car, although I don't doubt that on a rare occasion that has occurred. Some of my personal experiences - in 1988, four LAPD officers were involved in a horrific crash. Three died. None were wearing belts. The survivor was. Two of the dead officers would clearly have survived had they been wearing belts. In 2003 my elderly parents and another couple were in a roll over collision. All were properly secured and all escaped with relatively minor injuries. On March 15, 2006 my daughter-in-law and 3 year old granddaughter were in a head on collision where the combined speed was approximately 90 mph. Both were properly secured. Both survived with injuries. The other driver, who was not belted in, died at the scene.
You're wrong, Susan. I don't know your motivation, but you are absolutely wrong. Safety belts and child car seats save lives.
Ken Camp
6:41 am on Wednesday, August 31, 2011
You're right, Dan. Some of us are more interested in grandstanding our tea bagger philosophies than experiencing real life. And then we wring our hands and decide which government agency is to blame. I just feel sorry for the poor child and her mother.
Nimby pimp
6:32 pm on Tuesday, August 30, 2011
I don't know Susan and will respect the moderator's request for civility. But I am glad that Ken has called her out. Her comments reveal an ungenerous and corrosive character. Her willingness to use the death of a child as an opportunity to punish an ideology is reprehensible.
Ken Camp
8:51 am on Wednesday, August 31, 2011
For those who still believe that an infant should be able to make democratic decisions regarding seat belts, here is an article about a motorcycle protest against helmet laws that went awry:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/03/motorcyclist-dies-helmet-protest_n_889427.html
Laurie Allee
11:16 am on Wednesday, August 31, 2011
I would love to know if there is a family fund, scholarship fund or charitable organization for donations. I and so many others have been deeply affected by this tragedy and would like to help the family and honor Leiana's memory. I offer deepest condolences to the mother and other family and friends at this horrible time.
Ken Camp
11:55 am on Wednesday, August 31, 2011
Great idea! Someone in my neighborhood Yahoo group was also asking the same thing, so it appears there are people out there who want to help.
Alexis Lewis Rubatzky
2:17 pm on Thursday, September 1, 2011
Samika (mother of Leiana) is a friend of mine from college. They are a beautiful family and this is a tragedy that is beyond words. There is a fund set up for them here:
http://apps.facebook.com/fundrazr/activity/d37a1fdff27147a2b97ebd297781784a?psid=f70ca5ee474649f4af306d1dbb5269e4
Susan R
7:56 am on Friday, September 23, 2011
Chris, your article says 50% should survive:
Approximately 35,000 people die in motor vehicle crashes each year. About 50 percent (17,000) of these people could be saved if they wore their safety belts.
This sounds like you have a 50-50 chance of surviving with or without seatbelts. How many statistics are there on the people that survived by being thrown out of the car? I have seen many news stories where people did survive by being thrown out of the car and that people died because they were trapped in the car and could not get the seatbelt off.
My issue is not whether they save lives but rather that people should have the freedom to choose whether they wear them or not, just like they choose to eat good or bad food or smoke. Do we really want communist country where the government tells you what you can and can not do and how to live your life?
People do not have to agree. But this is something to think about. And, a good disagreement is healthy. Just no personal attacks.
Chris Colburn
8:53 am on Friday, September 23, 2011
1/2
In my experience, I have seen ONE person survive (to full recovery) an ejection (being thrown) from a vehicle. She was lucky enough to land in a freshly irrigated field in Northern CA (in most cases: human body + speed (=/<) 25MPH + pavement = DEATH). In ALL of the other wrecks I have responded to or treated in the ER, the seatbelt saved their lives. The others who died, would have done so regardless of a restraint like a seatbelt.
Should the big bad government require you to wear a seatbelt? My answer is a resounding YES. When insurance companies pay out to people who were injured while not following the law, our premiums go up. For those who are uninsured, it is us (the taxpayer) who pays for their care when their is no insurance to cover costs. If their injuries are lessoned by an active restraint, there is less time spent in a hospital recovering; so yes, make me wear my seatbelt.
Chris Colburn
8:54 am on Friday, September 23, 2011
2/2
You must also consider the quality of life of those survivors. I for one would not call a dibilitaing injury that requires around-the-clock care or being in a permanent vegitative state "survival". I worked in two facilities where I took care of accident "survivors" who were but empty shells of their former selves (comatose, on ventilators or with severe brain injuries with ZERO recovery prognosis). I don't want that for me or my loved ones, and would never associate that with "survival".
I do firmly believe that we should have the right to choose our own destinies with most things we do as free men/women. but the government has it right with this one.
And stop being so defensive, it wasn't a personal attack. Safety requirements are not stemming from communism, look up the word before you use it so freely to describe something so clearly unrelated. In fact, it is many of those safety rules that keep you alive and safe in the workplace, at home and in public. Do you want a world where people have no speed limit, no traffic laws, and people can throw their trash in the streets and dump hazardous chemicals in our rivers and oceans? Safety laws are there for a reason, and altough rigorous and cumbersome at times, they do SAVE LIVES.
Chris Colburn
8:58 am on Friday, September 23, 2011
Vehicle ejection survival rates from 2003:
http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/809782.PDF
Susan R
8:43 am on Saturday, September 24, 2011
First, I was not accusing you of personal attacks. There is someone else that blogs that does that, not you.
That report is very interesting. But yet complicated. It still sounds like a 50/50 chance of dying whether or not you have a seat belt on. And, especially confusing is the fatality rate regardless of seatbelt. And, what about those that die because they are trapped in a seat belt and can not get out of the car? Often we see on the news that it takes firefighters a long time to get an injured person out of a vehicle because they have a seat belt on.
If you want to be forced to wear a seat belt then that's fine. I don't think others should be forced. Where does it stop? No toys for kids at McDonald's, no fast food, no fried chicken, no greasy hamburgers, and might as well shut down all the Food4Less stores that sell nothing but low quality food.
And, no more playground at Burger King or McDonald's. Where does it stop? People need to take responsibility for their own lives. The government is NOT their parent.
I respect your point of view. I know it comes from experience.
Denise
12:03 am on Sunday, September 25, 2011
Susan, your points have nothing to do with this tragedy. Having a child in a car seat is completely different from your examples. This is not an adult making a decision, it is a small child. Are we a nanny state if we require parents to feed and clothe their children? Car seats make children significantly safer. Period. You are ignorant about this issue; the fact that you think you've seen accidents on the news that you think show something means absolutely nothing. (And you are even wrong about that--they have to use Jaws of Life and other methods when parts of the car have people pinned; they can slice a seatbelt quickly.) Cops and firefighters see car accidents on a pretty regular basis, are making no money from carseat sales, and have no reason to favor a "nanny state." They have been clear that children need to be in carseats, and to do otherwise is neglectful. Have some decency and let this be. A child is dead.
Nimby pimp
9:43 am on Saturday, September 24, 2011
Ah, that familiar drone of Tea Party talking points. The onset of Alzheimer's Disease perhaps? How else can we explain the persistently irrational, ahistorical Horatio Alger cant from a generation of middle class old timers who were the beneficiaries of human history's greatest moment of governmental munificence? Educated by the world's greatest public school system, assisted in the purchase of their homes by the GI Bill, their old age supplemented by Social Security and their upcoming hospice stay paid for by Medicare, they insist on demonizing the state's dark power over American lives. Whatever happened to the stoicism of the Greatest Generation who made genuine sacrifices for their country and then got old in quiet, noble dignity? Tea Party rhetoric invokes the inconography of a more dignified America, but Tea Partiers are anything but, choosing instead to act out their senior years with behavior appropriate of frustrated children. God Bless American indeed.
Ron Rosen
11:45 am on Saturday, September 24, 2011
Nimby Pimp: You're too good a writer to be using that name. Come out and tell us who you are!
Nimby pimp
8:41 am on Sunday, September 25, 2011
@Ron, What's in a name? A post by any other name would sting as much. This isn't TMZ or match.com. This is a forum for conversation about issues. Thanks for the good word.
Nimby pimp
9:47 am on Sunday, September 25, 2011
Another favorite trope of these people: My ignorance and bitterness is not my own doing. It is the fault of the state. But I choose personal responsibility.
Susan R
7:51 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Proved everyone wrong. Child would have been saved if not stuck in the car seat.
John Q. Public
8:27 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Sorry Susan, the only thing you proved is what a low-life you are to come back to such a tragic story to 6 months after a family has tried to put their lives back together with a comment like that. This would be one of the times that no one would want to be right; yet you feel the need to gloat? You should be ashamed of yourself!
Nimby pimp
10:27 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
She is truly wretched.
Ken Camp
9:15 am on Monday, February 20, 2012
"Proved everyone wrong"? Where is your "proof?" You don't care about this poor child, only in being "proven right." This is a neurosis of yours, not some tea bagger agenda. How many times must we read your rants on how nobody cares about noise pollution or one of the hundreds of things that bother your miserable life on Idell Street when you GLOAT over the death of a child? Why don't you just SHUT UP?
-- Ken Camp, Los Angeles