Huizar's Marijuana Motion Headed to City Council for Approval
In light of Supreme Court ruling, L.A. City Councilman José Huizar said city must go forward with his proposed marijuana business ban.
L.A. City Councilman José Huizar's proposal to ban all medical marijuana dispensaries in the Los Angeles was unanimously approved by the City Planning Commission on Thursday afternoon.
The proposed ordinance, which Huizar introduced in November, would shutter all of L.A.'s marijuana dispensaries, while still allowing authorized patients to grow their own marijuana or have a certified caregiver do so for them.
The motion will now move forward for final approval by the Los Angeles City Council.
Previously:
Councilman José Huizar has responded to the California Supreme Court's decision to review the controversial Pack v. City of Long Beach decision, saying it was "more imperative than ever" that the city enact a ban of all medical marijuana dispensaries.
In Pack, the California Second Court of Appeal ruled that Long Beach's medical marijuana ordinance--which included a lottery and permitting rules--violated the law by attempting to regulate a federally banned substance, rather than just decriminalize it.
Huizar has argued that, due to the similarities between Los Angeles' and Long Beach's ordinances, the city should repeal its current ordinance and ban all dispensaries, lest they remain vulnerable to similar lawsuits.
In response to Pack, Huizar has drafted a new medical marijuana ordinance that would ban marijuana dispensaries in Los Angeles, while still allowing authorized patients to grow their own marijuana, or have a certified caregiver do so for them.
Though the Supreme Court's decision had vacated the findings of Pack--as well as City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patient's Health and Wellness Center., Inc.--seemingly closing the door on potential lawsuits, Huizar said it was "more imperative than ever" that the city ban dispensaries.
The Pack ruling also gave permission to the City of Long Beach to move forward with its proposed dispensary ban--a precedent Huizar seems intent to follow.
"We are pleased that the California Supreme Court has decided to weigh in on this matter. We hope that the Court will reconfirm the right of cities to regulate medical marijuana businesses, particularly to control for the maximum amount allowed and to protect neighborhoods from an over-proliferation of medical marijuana dispensaries," Huizar said in an official statement. "We also are pleased that the Court unanimously voted to allow the City of Long Beach to implement its proposed ban on dispensaries during this time of legal chaos. Given that the Court's decision is not expected for another year or more, it is more imperative than ever that we repeal our current ordinance and ban medical marijuana businesses, while allowing patients to grow their own and while we wait for the Supreme Court's guidance."
Huizar's medical marijuana ordinance is set to go before the city's Planning Commission Jan. 26.
Conservative Christian
6:24 pm on Friday, January 20, 2012
I wonder what would be "an over proliferation"?
It seems like if "too many" open up, the good ones (good product, service, and price) will get the customers, and the bad ones (poor product, run by thugs, too expensive) will get run out of business.
clvngodess
6:09 am on Saturday, January 21, 2012
Yes, seems simple economic principles, especially free market capitalism would take care of this.
Conservative Christian
6:27 pm on Friday, January 20, 2012
Jesus said to do unto others as we would have them to do unto us. None of us would want our child or grandchild thrown in jail with the sexual predators over marijuana. None of us would want to see an older family member’s home confiscated and sold by the police for growing a couple of marijuana plants for their aches and pains.
If ordinary Americans could grow a little marijuana in their own back yards, it would be about as valuable as home-grown tomatoes. Let's put the criminals out of business and get them out of our neighborhoods; let the marijuana users grow a little in their own back yards and put the criminals out of business.
Cricket
11:08 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
I don't have a backyard......can I use yours?
Michael Novak
6:27 pm on Friday, January 20, 2012
how about banning the people who come up with these ideas sorry idea that isn't working has never worked and will never work.
clvngodess
6:11 am on Saturday, January 21, 2012
How about focusing on real issues, dispensaries don't necessarily generate more crime. Pot smokers don't necessarily create more crime. The prisons are filled with entirely too many pot "offenders" and not enough of the real criminals.
Linda and Bennie Padilla
8:21 am on Saturday, January 21, 2012
It did not work during prohibition where polititions and rich folks had their stash and regular folks went to prison. The only difference is that alcohol is much more dangerous both healthwise and with driving and anger issues than cannibus is. Legalize and tax it and move on. Good for everyone. If cannibus is legal, no more cartel and gang activity around it because there would be no money to be made from it. Do your research and move on.
Hulga
12:37 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
I totally agree.
Michael H
1:30 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
excuse me, but this make too much sense. you must be high right?
London
8:36 am on Saturday, January 21, 2012
If everyone that needs medical marijuana could grow their own medicinal grade marijuana we wouldn't be having this discussion would we? We wouldn't have dispensaries would we?
If there's a will there's a way ! Lazy politicians want the easy way out. Fix the ordinance, cut the numbers down but not drastically, lines out the door will be just as much if not more of a nuisance.
kelly thompson
8:42 am on Saturday, January 21, 2012
This specific motion is a waste of our taxpayer dollars. Focus needs to be on the specific issues regarding clinics. Closing them all down is not the solution. As with Huziars NELA art walk debacle the community will only be left to clean up and rebuild what we have already fought so hard to originally build. Please take the time to read Patch's earlier related posts and comments if you haven't. Also please note I have a friend that is way to sick to grow their own and rely on younger family member to pick up their medicine from clinics. So just growing is not really a good solution for those extremely ill.
STARCHY
11:31 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
yet ANOTHER reason why Joey Weezer is a terrible councilman.
we had a chance to get rid of him but you idiots voted him back - this kind of crap is ON YOU
Nimby pimp
2:52 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Thanks Starchy, I did vote for Huizar. His rival in the last election appeared to have an exceedingly cozy relationship with law enforcement - even had his own LAPD badge as I recall. I support Huizar's effort to discipline the mushrooming of pot shops in this area and have no sympathy for the pot shop lobbyists or the recreational users banging their highchairs on these pages.
STARCHY
8:11 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
you must LOVE ribbon cuttings! - have fun with that
xoxo
7:25 am on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
I remember a very on time ago, when we in California voted to legalize marijuana for medicinal purposes, AIDS, Cancer, etc... Maybe this need to revisited and requirements need to be made a bit more stingent. Regulation of Pot Pharmacy's needs to be created and better monitored, with huge fines for violations. Lastly, Taxes should be used be used to fund Anti-MJ campaign's, similar to anit-tobacco ads and programs. I don't feel we need to close of of them down, but uncontrolled buisesses without local resident's consent is unacceptable.
RoLo Torrex
2:15 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
could you imagine a rite aid operating like a pot dispensary? lol
RoLo Torrex
2:14 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
What? No more middle men? No more commercial pesticides on my pot? No more organized crime syndicates operating store fronts? And we thought this was the end of the civilized world.
Marcus
7:37 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
A ban on MJ dispensaries is needed since the Californian state law is being misused. It was too broad and written in a way to be interpreted as a free for all for anyone wishing to make a buck. This is not the Wild West anymore. We no long live a part from the rest of the world. There are a lot of people who live in Eagle Rock who might approve of legalization, but don't want to see control of this substance to random businesses. Yes there might be some who are legit, but society needs a form in which communities can control their neighborhood. If they want every other shop as a pot dispensary then great - vote on it, but I think most people would wish for some control. After all, we are not able to sell alcohol without restrictions, nor cigarettes, and the same applies to serving alcohol too. Why should pot be any different? This Huizar ban seems severe but considering that Doctors are controlled handing out prescriptions, it is yet another example of how the big issue of legalization should be addressed and a better State law to be written to allow dispensaries to exist but on a city by city basis.
STARCHY
8:14 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
"We no long live a part from the rest of the world" - on this issue we SHOULD!
I'm proud that Eagle Rock IS "the wild wild west" regarding the public's CLEAR desire to legalize weed. let's set the standard for the rest of the US and serve as an example.
Johnny
8:34 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
the party is over hippies!!!
STARCHY
8:37 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
hardly- we're just getting started.
Nimby pimp
10:20 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
I've never been been to a ribbon cutting, but I do cut my hair and bathe occasionally and I did manage to wean myself from smoking weed on a regular basis. I like mota, but studies show that life long stoners don't seem to develop emotionally. Starchy seems to be providing additional evidence.
Rob Schraff
11:45 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
Now that you mention it, anonymously smearing all medical marijuana patients as stinky people with long hair followed by citations of "studies show" is not particularly well-developed. Is someone is banging on his highchair?
And Huizar's argument that his new ordinance is "like" the one Long Beach and therefore legal, is just that - an argument. One that will certainly be subject to further court challenges and wrangling - and costs to the city. You can practically hear the lawyers scrambling to get in on the action.
STARCHY
12:28 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
hey Nimby pimp - you sound/ read like an angry old guy.
let me guess: you voted for Goldwater AND Nixon?
hang on as best you can pops- a world of change is coming and you aren't gonna like it....
Tim Ryder
11:11 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
Just letting everyone know that next Wednesday (Feb. 1st) is Jose Huizar's annual State of the Town address here in Eagle Rock so we are going to attend the event wearing Black attire to symbolize Mr. Huizar's misquided Black Market strategy. All rules apply of course, no yelling or calling names. That's what the Prohibition Crusaders like Michael Larsen do, we need to stick to the higher ground. This is just a peaceful show of disagreement against this new Prohibition on medical cannabis and to show support for these small collectives that have been such a benefit to the community.
David Klinger
12:04 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
Glad to see you are getting people together for the State of the Town. I hope that both sides can have an edifying discussion on this issue.
But I have to say, I don't think the Larsen smear was really necessary, and I think it reduces the impact of your post. "No yelling or name calling . . . that's what Larsen and the Prohibition Crusaders do." I don't recall Michael ever yelling at you, at least at ERNC meetings. In fact, he seems rather civil at those meetings. I realize that both you and Michael are very vocal on this issue, but I don't think the posturing or name calling on either side is all that helpful. When I hear petty name-calling and veiled insults, I tend to ignore the speaker.
Rob Schraff
11:32 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
What time, location?
Cricket
11:15 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
This makes no sense. I spend about $60/month on MMJ because I only smoke a bowl before going to bed to help me sleep. So now, they're proposing I spend a couple hundred dollars on materials for growing, buy a house with a yard, find some way of protecting my plants from being pilfered as they grow in the yard, wait 6 months or so for it to bloom and all because people don't want to look at dispensaries? Maybe I should tell my grandmother, who is insulin dependent, that she will need to start making her own insulin shots at home because I don't like looking at a CVS on every corner.
Jonah
10:20 am on Thursday, February 2, 2012
Answer this. I guess you never got pot before the pot shops opened? No?
Btw, you don't need a yard to grow. You can grow in any dwelling. Apt, condo etc.and protect the grow easily. You could harvest quality in much less then 6 months if you really need to and this is fact ask any grower.
Weed is extremely easy to grow and practically grows itself and you could set up to grow for less then $100 so no more excuses.
Josef Bray-Ali
11:29 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
Jose Huizar is absolutely clear on this issue: he wants to make sure that we can get back to destroying lives by waging a drug war. You don't get elected to city council to solve problems if there aren't any problems to solve! How will the jails stay stocked up if NELA doesn't keep up its arrest numbers?! Think of the job losses if the jails, prisons, and courts weren't flooded with drug war arrests. Lawyers, social workers, cops, prison guards, suppliers and contractors of all stripes have been feeding off the trough of human misery from our drug war.
And you "hippies" (legalizing marijuana is an issue for those younger than 40 i.e. not born early enough to be "hippies") thought you could just go out and free yourselves.
What does this weed do in our community? I don't see more fights breaking out. I don't see more shootings or crime because of it. If a busy dispensary is not keeping it's neighborhood clean - there are ordinances on the books to take care of businesses not doing their fair share to maintain and respect the neighborhood.
From scaring off organizers of Second Saturday to fighting against the devil weed, Huizar is out in front of the pack as a retrograde political dinosaur politician. Art Night and pot dispensaries have actually created employment in this area - unlike his freeway overpass built on Valley Blvd in El Sereno. He is governing from the 20th century, while we are 12 years into the 21st.
Michael Larsen
12:38 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
The Eagle Rock Neighborhood Council as well as TERA support Councilmember Huizar's motion to repeal the LA ordinance and ban storefront and delivery dispensaries until the California Supreme Court and/or the California Legislature can clarify an acceptable regulatory scheme.
We all agree that medical marijuana should be available to legitimate patients in way that is safe and respectful for both the patients and communities.
The status quo in Los Angeles does not meet those standards, which is why our local groups as well as the LA City Planning Commission and the LA Public Safety Committee agree Mr. Huizar's plan is the smartest route forward.
Little Lebowski
3:40 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Although Mr. Huizar and his supporters frequently voice their support for Prop. 215 that California voters passed, I have noticed that they rarely address the difficulty and potential hardship that a "legitimate patient" would have in actually growing medicinal cannabis.
Contrary to popular belief, growing high-quality cannabis requires some expertise. Indoor cultivation requires a substantial investment in growing equipment, electricity, and time. Outdoor cultivation requires a yard, and exposes the plants to pests and possible theft by neighbors, including minors.
What if the patient is elderly or seriously ill? What if the patient is unable to find a qualified caregiver who has the resources, space, and expertise to grow cannabis for them?
I have yet to hear a substantive response to any of these concerns. Anyone?
Jonah
10:23 am on Thursday, February 2, 2012
Correct!
Nimby pimp
1:02 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
@ Rob Schraff. If you've been paying attention -and we know you do - this anonymous poster has been very clear about his support for medical marijuana for legitimate patients. If you need further evidence for the underdeveloped emotional development of chronic pot heads, try putting an old Paul McCartney and Wings album on the ol' turntable and "Go Listen to What the Man Said." @ STARCHY. Party on Wayne!
Rob Schraff
1:19 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
Hey, I don't even have to put it on, it was my favorite album right about when I started using marijuana in high school, and I know the lyrics by heart! (OK, sophomoric, but give me a break, I was a sophomore. I do have the vinyl somewhere though!) I'm also fine with my emotional development and contributions to the community and my family over the last 35 years or so, thank you.
Also couldn't help notice now you don't even have a flip "surveys show" to back up your assertion. Tsk. I do pay attention, and you can do better, Mr. Pimp. So maybe you could help Michael Larsen come up with some actual facts or evidence of how much Eagle Rock has suffered at the hands of medical marijuana patients and clinics? Or come up with a cogent policy argument explaining why your pimping of Mr. Huizar's motion, if successful, won't actually increase crime and violence by turning marijuana sales back to gangs?
Nimby pimp
1:33 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
Geez Rob. A congent policy argument on this issue? I'm gonna leave that for the stoners, the salesmen and the guy running for City Attorney. As for the surveys, I know I've read a few, but I can't remember. Blame it on those bong loads I did in school. As for the gangs, me and Larson are going to be going door to door the deal with those fools once this pot business is handled. But he's going in first.
Rob Schraff
2:03 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
Sorry, this stoner has a UCLA public affairs minor, and I got carried away. Since you are anonymous, and brought it up, do you have any inside info on Huizar's much-rumored run for LA City Attorney? At least this would make sense of the political side of Huizar's cowardice and willingness to throw medical marijuana patients under Mr. Larsen's bus.
As for your admirable gang reduction strategy, I bet you $20 bucks Mikey would do it.
Nimby pimp
2:24 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
The councilman floated the idea to me over a bowl of killer kush at a "Silly Love Songs" karaoke bash at Larsen's pad. The pot mess is a heaven-sent opportunity for Jose to get some law and order credibility. it's a winner. Unless you think the Wayne's World bunch is going to get off the sofa and mobilize a massive get-out-the-vote campaign for the cause.
Rob Schraff
2:58 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
I knoow, don't you just melt when he sings the "IIIII love you" chorus? He's so cute! And he went to Princeton and Cal and UCLA too, meho! So what's the next Huizar-Larsen-Pimp law and order plan after this "win"?
- Attack the homeless?
- Take away park amenities from the community?
- Drive the rest of the arts community out of Highland Park?
- More crack-downs on food trucks and bike rides?
- Another failed war on alleged "illegal" massage parlors?
I can hardly wait to hear how Jose is planning on "do(ing) it to me one more time" -
let us know when he slips the date of the City Attorney announcement to you.
Nimby pimp
3:14 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
I don't know about the other stuff, but I've heard talk about a "Soylent Green" strategy. This will solve both the homeless and school nutrition problems quietly and economically. It also would appear that resin has accumulated on your pop music mental phonographic needle. The Captain and Tenille "Did it To You" ad nauseam from their home in Glendale - a city that knows how to deal with their social ills.
STARCHY
3:41 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
Joey Weezer is a loser. look at the blight in our neighborhood from his incompetence.
he's a smile and suit who schleps his family around to photo opps
Rob Schraff
3:55 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
Hey, the soylent green policy sounds very effective, and could solve not only the homeless, but the Medicare problem. A generation ago it could have solved the pot problem. After Darryl Gates said marijuana user should be "lined potheads up against the wall and shot," that's what you could have done with the bodies.
So, while I get how the homeless could be described as a illness caused by society, what harm do medical marijuana patients (and for that matter the homeless!) really cause? No evidence, mostly the sound of the ERNC and the 0.01% ranting these old, worn out smears. And the sound of one anonymous Huizar fan clapping.
And as far as 70's dreck pop (a very wide field) how about, straight out of Downey, the news that despite his hubris, Huizar is no longer "On top of the World, Looking Down at Creation," thanks to his pathetic election results in a very expensive race against a mediocre opponent.
Finally, as shown in some ways by this discussion, Glendale exports its "social ills" to LA. How does LA export its so-called "social ills" to LA? Heres how: make all medical marijuana patients a "social ill," and move sales it from easily identifiable clinics to random people in parks and alleys. Brilliant!
Nimby pimp
3:43 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
Yo Rudy, Why the name "Starchy?"
Rob Schraff
4:16 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
Yo yo pimp! Why less than 10% turnout in one on the most expensive council elections in LA history in the last Council 14 election? Both candidates, and the campaign, were a disgrace.
Don't go Huizar-love-blind rah-rah on us, man.
STARCHY
12:41 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
Yo Nimby - why the ignorance?
check out la.curbed.com
Nimby pimp
5:05 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
Wayne's World.
David Fonseca
5:32 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
Hey Nimby, deleted your comment due to the use of profanity. Please see our terms of use.
Nimby pimp
5:36 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
Oooops. What was the word I used?
Nimby pimp
5:38 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
Yo Rob - I had an answer for you but it got deleted because I inadvertently used a naughty word. Sorry about that.
Rob Schraff
5:51 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
No worries, I got it and I thought your points were goo. How about fly-speck and re-post?
Rob Schraff
5:54 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
Good! Good! Geez.
Nimby pimp
2:19 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
Yo Starch - LA Curbed is a big ol' site. Anything in particular you want to call to my attention? I do appreciate the anonymous post suggesting that "the President of the United States SMOKED WEED in Highland Park." That T-shirt would make a great raffle prized at a CD14 stoner, er "bake" sale should you decide to raise some money for the cause.
STARCHY
10:59 am on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
I'm not "Rudy" (dingus)
So lemme guess: you'd prefer some Republican in 2012? no surprise there...
Nimby pimp
12:45 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Yo Starch. I've never voted for a Republican in my life and can't see any reason to start now. Next guess Einstein?
STARCHY
2:41 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
so why you hating on President Obama numnuts?
Nimby pimp
4:07 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Gosh Starch. You might want to lay off the doobies for a few years. Dave's not here, man.
STARCHY
5:40 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
so why you do you hate President Obama so much ??
BTW: nobody says "doobies"- you're slipping up grandpa!
Nimby pimp
6:02 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Starch - A mind is a terrible thing to waste. Or, if you prefer, as the great Dan Quayle once said, "what a waste it is to lose one’s mind. Or not to have a mind is being very wasteful. How true that is.”
STARCHY
6:27 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
too late for you old man. hey look out! the night nurse is stealing your comic books!!
Nimby pimp
6:31 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Good one Starch!
Jonah
10:33 am on Thursday, February 2, 2012
"What if the patient is elderly or seriously ill? What if the patient is unable to find a qualified caregiver who has the resources, space, and expertise to grow cannabis for them?
I have yet to hear a substantive response to any of these concerns. Anyone?"
In that case the elderly or ill could obtain meds from any friend(s) family member, acquaintance etc....they could easily obtain pot meds everywhere without pot shops. There is your substantive response you are looking for so no more excuses.
Little Lebowski
12:27 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2012
Thanks for the thoughtful reply, Jonah. So your response to those who are seriously ill is to have them ask a friend, family member, or "acquaintance" to purchase a bag of black-market product from their local drug dealer (maybe at the Eagle Rock Recreation Center?). No doubt this compassionate, well-trained service provider will offer a wide selection of untainted, top-quality meds that will help alleviate their symptoms---all in a safe, comfortable environment. And think of the positive impact on the community! No more excuses!
It sounds as though you have put about as much thought into this issue as Mr. Huizar. Well done!
malcolm kyle
7:12 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
The whole world watches while we pepper-spray, taser and cudgel our own citizens for exercising their birth-right to assemble peacefully; The whole world watches while we strip-search and anally probe our own wheelchair-bound great grandmothers on suspicion of being terrorists; The whole world watches while heavily armed & masked government thugs break into our homes to ridicule, bully, threaten and murder us for using or growing a medically efficacious weed.
The prohibitionist model is one of blind ignorance, abject failure and economic collapse. Its underlying ideology is one of fear, envy, greed and hate.
Never have so many been endangered and impoverished by so few, so quickly!
* Do you wish to greatly reduce, even almost eliminate the market in illegal narcotics? Then please help us to dismantle Prohibition enabling us to Legalize, Regulate and Tax!
* Do you wish to bring about an enormous reduction in the presence and influence of organized crime? Then please help us to dismantle Prohibition enabling us to Legalize, Regulate and Tax!
* Do you wish to reduce harm to the existing users and addicts - who may be your children, brothers, sisters, parents or neighbors - by allowing them safe and controlled legal access, which will greatly minimize the possibility of 'peer-initiation' and sales to minors? Then please help us to dismantle Prohibition enabling us to Legalize, Regulate and Tax!
STARCHY
3:58 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012
Malcolm I hear ya!
BUT let's not get carried away- all we NEED to do is legalize it.
You can keep the "regulate and tax" part...